Twitch deletes VODs after 14 days. If you're a partner, you get 60. Either way, your content has an expiration date. That 8-hour stream where you had the best RP arc of your career? Gone in two weeks. The clip where chat lost their minds? Dead in a month.
YouTube doesn't delete anything. A video uploaded in 2016 still gets recommended in 2026. YouTube search is the second-largest search engine on the planet. Your content sitting there is a permanent asset. Your content sitting on Twitch is a temporary event.
This isn't opinion. It's how the platforms work.
Take a typical 8-hour stream. Not a special event. Just a regular Tuesday.
Inside those 8 hours, there are roughly 4 full story arcs worth extracting as standalone videos (10-30 minutes each). There are at least 8 moments that work as Shorts (under 60 seconds). That's 12 pieces of content from a single stream.
| Content type | Per stream | YouTube value |
|---|---|---|
| Full stories (10-30 min) | ~4 | Watch time, subscribers, search |
| Shorts (<60s) | ~8 | Discovery, new audience |
| Total searchable content | ~12 | Compounds over months/years |
If you stream 5 days a week, that's 60 pieces of content per week sitting in YouTube search. 240 per month. After a year, you have nearly 3,000 videos working for you 24/7 -- while you sleep, while you're offline, while you're playing a different game.
Most streamers produce zero YouTube content from their streams.
Ludwig has a clips channel. Hasan has a clips channel. xQc has multiple. Every major streamer who's built a lasting YouTube presence has someone cutting their streams into standalone content.
The difference: they pay editors. A dedicated editor running a clips channel costs $2,000-5,000/month. That editor watches the VOD, finds the moments, cuts them, writes titles, makes thumbnails, and uploads. It's a full-time job.
That cost makes sense if you're pulling 30K concurrent viewers. It doesn't make sense if you're at 200. Or 2,000. Or even 5,000. The economics don't work for 99% of streamers.
Your main channel is your brand. You control the upload schedule, the thumbnails, the narrative. A second channel is your archive -- the place where stream content lives and gets discovered by search.
Some streamers put clips on their main channel. That works too. The point isn't the channel structure. The point is that the content exists on YouTube at all.
The second-channel approach has one advantage: it doesn't disrupt your main channel's upload cadence. YouTube's algorithm rewards consistency. If your main channel uploads twice a week and suddenly you're dumping 12 videos from last night's stream, the algorithm gets confused. A second channel has its own cadence. Its own audience. Its own growth curve.
The bottleneck was never "should I put my streams on YouTube." Every streamer knows they should. The bottleneck was the labor. Watching an 8-hour VOD. Finding the moments. Cutting them. Writing metadata. Uploading. Reviewing.
That's what we automate. The full pipeline: VOD in, reviewed videos out. No editor. No manual clipping. No watching your own 8-hour stream to find the 4 good parts.
The cost difference is not subtle.
| Approach | Monthly cost | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Human editor | $2,000-5,000 | ~30-60 videos |
| Reruns.tv pipeline | $149 | ~240 videos |
| Doing it yourself | $0 + 40hrs | Burnout |
Your streams already happened. The content already exists. It's just trapped in a format (8-hour VOD) that nobody watches and a platform (Twitch) that deletes it.
Put it somewhere permanent.
Turn your streams into a permanent YouTube library.
View pricing